Tuesday, January 30, 2007

Consumer Reports' guide to auto insurance

guide to auto insurance Many people stick with the same insurance carrier year after year without ever shopping for a better deal. Blind loyalty to one insurer can cost you dearly. In a recent survey, Consumer Reports found that some drivers were paying twice as much for a policy than they would have with another insurer.

Finding the best rates


Comparing premiums is easier than ever, thanks to online services such as Quicken Insurance (www.quicken.com/insurance) and InsWeb (www.insweb.com). While you can also use the Yellow Pages to canvass local insurance agents for quotes, online services let you compare multiple price quotes in minutes.

You should make this price comparison at least once a year. Still, it may not be a good idea to switch companies too often or arbitrarily. Sometimes loyalty pays. For instance, if you've been with one company several years and maintained a clean driving record, you may qualify for a safe-driver discount, which substantially lowers your premium. But if you're contemplating a switch, the new company may be willing to classify you as a safe driver. In addition, you can often get a discount for insuring more than one vehicle—or your home—with the same company.

To get an accurate quote, you'll need to provide information on the car or cars that you intend to insure: the make, model, year, trim line, and the vehicle identification number (VIN). You'll also need to give the age, sex, and recent driving record of all potential drivers. Some companies may also ask where you normally park your car, and inquire about any aftermarket accessories you may have installed to prevent theft. The insurer may independently check your driving history using public documents such as police records, and your insurance history through your current and former insurers.

Buy the right amount


Auto insurance is meant to protect you against catastrophic losses, such as a major accident or the theft of your car. Be prepared to absorb minor losses yourself, and you'll save a lot. Here are tips on separating the essentials from coverage you can probably live without.

Coverage you must have


Bodily injury liability. Should you cause an accident, the "liability" part of your insurance coverage pays the medical, rehabilitation, and, if necessary, funeral bills of your passengers, the other driver, his or her passengers, and any pedestrians involved. It also covers pain and suffering awards as well as legal costs.

Buy coverage that will pay at least $100,000 per person and $300,000 per accident. If you have sizable assets, consider increasing those limits to $250,000 per person and $500,000 per accident. Such added coverage will raise your premium at least 10 percent. Consumer Reports recommends that people with a high net worth have a separate "umbrella" policy to insure against a lawsuit seeking an amount beyond their auto policy's limits. You may need to buy higher insurance limits to qualify for an umbrella policy.

Property damage. This coverage pays to repair or replace another person's vehicle or other property damaged by your car. States typically require only $10,000 to $25,000. We suggest buying coverage of $100,000.

Uninsured and underinsured motorist coverage. This covers medical bills, rehabilitation, and funeral costs, as well as losses for pain and suffering for you or the passengers in your car when an accident is caused by a hit-and-run driver or someone who has little or no insurance. Get the same amount of this coverage as you do bodily injury coverage. That way, if someone who has no insurance hits you, your medical costs will be covered.


Coverage you'll probably need


Collision and comprehensive. Collision coverage pays to repair or replace your car no matter who or what caused the accident. Comprehensive pays to repair or replace your car if it's stolen or damaged as a result of a storm or other natural event. Coverage kicks in for the amount above your deductible. Choose the highest deductible you can afford to pay out of pocket—at least $500. Once the cost of this coverage equals 10 percent of your vehicle's book value, you might want to cancel it, since you will collect no more than your vehicle's market worth. Antique vehicles or cars with collector value sometimes are insured through a separate rider; or you may have to find a separate, specialty insurer.

Personal-injury protection. PIP reimburses you for lost wages and in-home care needed as a result of an accident. If you have separate health and disability policies, you can buy just the state-required minimum for PIP. The other policies should cover the balance of your needs.

Medical-payments coverage. Sometimes called med-pay, this covers medical bills for you and your passengers, regardless of who's at fault. When this coverage isn't automatically included in your policy, its costs are minimal. You may not require any if you have good health insurance. To protect passengers who may not have their own health coverage, you may want to carry at least $5,000 of this coverage.


Additional types of coverage


Roadside assistance. This coverage pays to have your vehicle towed. If you already have an auto-club membership or your car's manufacturer provides this service for free, don't buy this extra coverage.

Rental reimbursement. This coverage typically costs $30 per year and pays for a rental car—usually for up to 30 days—if your vehicle is stolen or is in the shop for repairs sustained in an accident. There's usually a cap on the amount you're reimbursed per day and per occurrence.


Money-saving tips


Ask for the top tier. Insurers sort customers according to their likelihood of filing a claim, then assign them to one of several categories commonly referred to as tiers. Top-tier customers who have had few or no claims in the past several years and live in neighborhoods where auto-theft rates are low, for example, can easily save 15 percent or more off the standard rate. But simply because you qualify initially or improve your driving record doesn't mean you automatically get top-tier status.

Check rates before you buy a car. The difference in premiums between one car or truck and another can be substantial. Much of that has to do with the cost of repairing collision damage, which can vary greatly even among seemingly similar vehicles.

Get equipment discounts. You may qualify for extra discounts if your car has current safety equipment such as air bags or antilock brakes. Also check about anti-theft equipment such as an alarm system, which can get you a break on the comprehensive part of your coverage.

Group your policies. Most insurers will give you a multiple-policy price break if you let them write your auto, home, and personal-liability coverage.

Improve your driving skills. Completing a certified defensive-driving course can reduce your premium in some states.

Kid factors. If you have children who drive, you'll save if they get good grades or if they attend a school located more than 100 miles from your home and don't use the car there.

Group discounts. Insurers award discounts to low-risk consumers who share a common affiliation such as a membership in an employee group, a company pension fund, or an alumni association. These so-called affinity discounts can be sizable, so if they apply to you, it pays to take advantage of them. Ask your insurer if any groups to which you belong qualify for such a discount. Alternatively, ask representatives of the groups if they work with any insurance companies.

Keep repair options open. Some insurers insist you use generic replacement parts or encourage you to bring your vehicle to certain body shops in an effort to cut claims costs. While this arrangement may lower your premium, you may want to preserve your flexibility by insuring with a company that lets you decide which parts are used (original equipment or aftermarket copies), and who does the repairs. In tests a few years ago, Consumer Reports found none of the aftermarket replacement bumpers tested fit as well as factory-original bumpers or stood up as well to low-speed impacts. We also had trouble making generic fenders fit properly.

Education factor in auto insurance rate under fire

Education factor auto insurance

DAYTONA BEACH -- Is it fair to make a janitor pay $112 more than a lawyer to insure a car in Florida?

GEICO and a few other insurers say yes, because blue-collar workers are more likely than professionals to have accidents.

State Insurance Commissioner Kevin McCarty has begun looking into the issue, nearly a year after the Consumer Federation of America first urged regulators throughout the nation to scrutinize GEICO's billing methods.

J. Robert Hunter, insurance director for the Washington-based advocacy group, said his organization had documented that GEICO is using a driver's education level and occupation as factors in setting premiums for vehicle owners in nearly every state, including Florida. At least three other insurers -- Allstate, Progressive and Liberty Mutual -- have begun doing the same thing but to a lesser extent.

A GEICO underwriting guide distributed by the federation states GEICO will give its best rates to occupations requiring degrees, such as doctors, lawyers, engineers, teachers and editors. Conversely, the highest rates will be assigned to "minimally skilled clerks, assistants, postal clerks, stock clerks ... route men and long-haul drivers" as well as low-ranking members of the military.

The guide also calls for giving preference to drivers younger than 70 and refusing coverage to any newly licensed driver over 75.

Nationally, the federation found, a 25-year-old executive with a law degree would pay GEICO an average of $527 to insure a 1996 Ford Taurus. A janitor who's the same age and has the same driving record but has just a high school diploma would pay $741, or 40 percent more.

In Florida, the pricing gap is narrower but still significant, the group said. Looking at rates charged by GEICO in Miami, it said the executive would pay $729 while the janitor would be billed $841, a 15 percent difference.

McCarty said the rating method may be a back-door way to make minorities and poor people pay more for coverage. He has scheduled a public hearing for 9 a.m. Feb. 9 at the Larson Building in Tallahassee to hear comments about it.

"I am concerned that the use of occupational and educational rating is nothing more than a proxy for race-based premiums," McCarty said in a statement announcing the hearing. "Race or economic discrimination in the availability and affordability of insurance -- intentional or otherwise -- is unacceptable."

A GEICO spokeswoman said education and occupation are just two of more than 20 factors the company uses to price its policies. The company also considers age, gender, driving record, accident experience and vehicle type, said Christine Tasher, public relations director.

All the factors, she said, are "fair and accurate predictors of loss."

"If consumers from certain occupations and educational levels were not getting lower rates from GEICO, they would be buying insurance from GEICO's competitors," Tasher said. "But the numbers show they are choosing to insure with GEICO."

GEICO, which stands for Government Employees Insurance Co., is the nation's fourth largest car insurer and is growing faster than its competitors. Based in Chevy Chase, Md., it's owned by Warren Buffett's Berkshire Hathaway conglomerate.

The practice isn't confined to just GEICO. Hunter said Liberty Mutual also has started taking education into account in setting premiums, and other insurance companies may feel pressured to follow suit.

"We urge you to prohibit this practice before it becomes widespread," Hunter said in a letter to the National Association of Insurance Commissioners in Kansas City, Mo.

Allstate Insurance doesn't examine education levels in Florida, but does so in some other states, spokesman Ryan Priest said.

"It's just one factor of many factors we look at," Priest said. "People who have more education tend to file fewer claims."

Progressive Insurance makes the same argument. Although it hasn't started using education in Florida yet, its Internet and telephone sales unit began using the education factor in Colorado earlier this month, spokeswoman Katherine M. Bell said. The company plans to extend it to other states.

Bell said the company believes it should be able to use any information that's "actuarially justified -- that is, statistically proven to help predict loss."

"We also believe that insurers should be open with consumers about the information they use," she added.

Joe Annotti, a representative of the Property and Casualty Insurers of America, a trade group, said the use of occupation and education criteria, pioneered by GEICO, is part of a larger trend to make insurance pricing as customized as possible.

Ten years ago, he said, auto insurers had just three price levels for their policies: standard, nonstandard and preferred. "Today, a company like Progressive has something like 137 different price breaks."

Annotti said data mining, credit scoring and other computerized research methods help make sure all customers pay their fair share for the amount of risk they pose for an insurance company.

Spokesmen for State Farm and MetLife Home & Auto said their companies weren't using the educational and occupational criteria.

However, Chris Neal, assistant public affairs manager of State Farm, said his company supports the right of other insurers to use that method as long as they can show it isn't discriminatory.

"Insurance has come down to a game of who can best pick the risks," he said. "We don't like to see restrictions on underwriting guidelines."

© 2007 News-Journal Corporation

Friday, January 26, 2007

InsWeb Reports Fourth Quarter and Fiscal 2006 Financial Results

InsWebSACRAMENTO, CA -- (MARKET WIRE) -- January 25, 2007 -- InsWeb Corp. (NASDAQ: INSW) today announced results for the fourth quarter and year ended December 31, 2006. Revenues for the fourth quarter were $5.8 million, compared to $5.8 million in the fourth quarter of 2005 and $7.5 million in the third quarter of 2006. InsWeb’s net loss for the fourth quarter was $0.3 million, or $0.08 per share. This compares to a net loss in the fourth quarter of 2005 of $2.1 million, or $0.51 per share, and to a net loss of $1.6 million, or $0.39 per share, in the third quarter of 2006.

For fiscal year 2006, InsWeb reported total revenues of $28.5 million and a net loss of $3.4 million, or $0.82 per share. These results of operations include a gain of $2.0 million from the sale of InsWeb Insurance Services’ property and casualty agency book of business in April of 2006. The fiscal year 2006 financial results compare to revenues of $25.0 million and a net loss of $5.9 million, or $1.40 per share, for fiscal year 2005.

“As we previously reported, InsWeb significantly narrowed its net loss during the fourth quarter, driven primarily by a reduction in non-marketing operating expenses in combination with our focused efforts to improve margins through our consumer marketing programs,” said Hussein Enan, chairman and CEO of InsWeb. “In addition, revenue per consumer within our auto offering increased by 14% during the quarter, reflecting continued enhancements within our AgentInsider offering and further expansion of our Sponsored Web Links program. We are optimistic heading into what is typically our seasonally strongest quarter of the year. With our improving business fundamentals, we are striving to bring the Company to operating profitability within 2007 and believe we have sufficient cash levels to achieve that goal.”

Financial Highlights and Metrics:

Revenues:                       Dec 31, 2006   Sept 30, 2006  Dec 31, 2005
-------------- -------------- --------------

Transaction fee revenues:
Auto insurance $ 4,187,000 $ 5,549,000 $ 4,461,000
Term life insurance 1,210,000 1,310,000 1,129,000
Other insurance offerings 349,000 562,000 133,000
-------------- -------------- --------------
5,746,000 7,421,000 5,723,000
Development and maintenance
fees 78,000 84,000 96,000
-------------- -------------- --------------
Total revenues $ 5,824,000 $ 7,505,000 $ 5,819,000
============== ============== ==============




Direct Marketing
(Consumer Acquisition):
Dec 31, 2006 Sept 30, 2006 Dec 31, 2005
------------- ------------- -------------

Direct marketing costs $ 3,275,000 $ 5,198,000 $ 4,181,000
Direct marketing as a percent
of revenues 56% 69% 72%
Number of consumers 1,021,000 1,514,000 1,272,000
Marketing cost per consumer $ 3.21 $ 3.43 $ 3.29
Total revenue per consumer $ 5.70 $ 4.96 $ 4.57



Definitions:

"Direct marketing costs" Represents expenses incurred by InsWeb to drive
consumer traffic to InsWeb's online insurance
marketplace;

"Number of consumers" Represents a consumer who has started an InsWeb
application;

"Per consumer information" Represents transaction revenue earned or
marketing costs incurred per consumer who has
started an application.




Auto Marketplace: Dec 31, 2006 Sept 30, 2006 Dec 31, 2005
-------------- -------------- --------------

Auto insurance revenues $ 4,187,000 $ 5,549,000 $ 4,461,000
Number of consumers 903,000 1,359,000 1,179,000
Revenue per consumer $ 4.64 $ 4.08 $ 3.78


A significant share of InsWeb’s auto marketplace revenues is derived from its two initiatives to sell consumer leads to local insurance agents, InsWeb’s internal program (AgentInsider) and a third party agent network (NetQuote, Inc.). NetQuote represented 21% of auto transaction fees for the fourth quarter of 2006. The success of AgentInsider will be dependent on the rate of registration and the degree of participation by local personal lines insurance agents throughout the country. At December 31, 2006, AgentInsider’s reach (percentage of auto consumers who receive a quote from an AgentInsider agent) extended to 74% of the consumers who shop the InsWeb auto insurance marketplace, up from 53% at September 30, 2006.

Term Life Marketplace:           Dec 31, 2006   Sept 30, 2006  Dec 31, 2005
-------------- -------------- --------------

Term life insurance revenues $ 1,210,000 $ 1,310,000 $ 1,129,000
Number of consumers 62,000 70,000 67,000
Number of closed policies 1,176 1,381 1,282
Other Highlights:
--  Cash and short-term investments at December 31, 2006 were $6.8
million;
-- Accounts receivable at quarter end were $2.8 million, representing 45
days sales outstanding;
-- Total staff was 95 as of December 31, 2006 and September 30, 2006.
About InsWeb

InsWeb (NASDAQ: INSW) enables consumers to compare multiple, actionable quotes for auto, term life, health, homeowners, renters and condominium insurance offerings from many of the nation’s highly rated insurers. The top-rated online insurance marketplace also provides live customer service, interactive tools and independent research. Headquartered in Sacramento, Calif., InsWeb is accessible at www.insweb.com.

For further information regarding InsWeb Corporation, please review the Company’s filings with the Securities and Exchange Commission, including Quarterly Reports on Form 10-Q and Annual Reports on Form 10-K, and in particular Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations.

This news release contains forward-looking statements reflecting management's current forecast of certain aspects of the Company's future. It is based on current information, which we have assessed, but which by its nature is dynamic and subject to rapid and even abrupt changes. Forward-looking statements include statements regarding: projected future revenues, expenses and financial position; marketing and consumer acquisition; the results of strategic initiatives, including AgentInsider and the term life agency; increased or decreased participation by insurance companies; product and technological implementations; and projected expenditures and growth. The Company's actual results might differ materially from those stated or implied by such forward-looking statements due to risks and uncertainties associated with the Company's business, which include, but are not limited to: variations in consumer usage of the internet to shop for and purchase insurance; the willingness and capability of insurance companies or other insurance entities to offer their products or instant quotes on the Company’s website or through the Company’s licensed subsidiaries; changes in the Company's relationships with existing insurance companies or other customers, including, changes due to consolidation within the insurance industry; changes in the Company’s relationship with strategic and/or marketing partners; the Company's ability to attract and integrate new insurance companies and strategic partners; implementation of competing Internet strategies by existing and potential insurance Company participants; implementation and consumer acceptance of new product or service offerings, such as policy fulfillment and other agency based services; the outcome of litigation in which the Company is a party; implementation and acceptance of new initiatives; insurance and financial services industry regulation; competition in all aspects of the Company's business; fluctuations in operating results; or other unforeseen factors. The forward-looking statements should be considered in the context of these and other risk factors disclosed in the Company's filings with the Securities and Exchange Commission.

“INSWEB” and “AGENTINSIDER” are registered service marks of InsWeb Corporation. All marks above are those of InsWeb Corporation, except for those of insurance insurers, brokers, agents, industry organizations, financial institutions, online partners, service providers, other mentioned companies and educational institutions, which are the marks of their respective entities.

                            INSWEB CORPORATION
CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF OPERATIONS
[Amounts in thousands, except net loss per share]
[unaudited]


Three months ended Year ended
December 31, December 31,
------------------ ------------------
2006 2005 2006 2005
-------- -------- -------- --------
Revenues:
Transactions $ 5,746 $ 5,723 $ 28,161 $ 24,650
Development and maintenance
fees 78 96 340 365
-------- -------- -------- --------
Total revenues 5,824 5,819 28,501 25,015

Operating expenses:
Technology (2) 721 1,233 4,459 5,354
Sales and marketing (2) 4,861 5,923 26,088 21,977
General and administrative (2) 719 846 3,799 4,023
-------- -------- -------- --------
Total operating expenses 6,301 8,002 34,346 31,354
-------- -------- -------- --------
Loss from operations (477) (2,183) (5,845) (6,339)
Interest income 139 109 425 398
Other income (expense), net 2 - 2,050 -
-------- -------- -------- --------
Net loss ($ 336) ($ 2,074) ($ 3,370) ($ 5,941)
======== ======== ======== ========

Net loss per share – basic and
diluted:
Net loss ($ 0.08) ($ 0. 51) ($ 0.82) ($ 1.40)
======== ======== ======== ========

Weighted average shares used in
computing net loss per share –
basic and diluted (1) 4,099 4,066 4,092 4,234
======== ======== ======== ========

(1) Shares used in the computation of net loss per share of common stock
are based on the weighted average number of shares outstanding in
each period.

(2) Amounts reported include stock-based compensation expense as follows:

Technology $ 11 $ 32
Sales and marketing 30 126
General and administrative 144 273
-------- --------
Total operating expenses $ 185 $ 431
======== ========




INSWEB CORPORATION
CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEETS
[Amounts in thousands]
[unaudited]

December 31, December 31,
2006 2005
------------ ------------
ASSETS

Current assets:
Cash and cash equivalents $ 6,750 $ 9,073
Short-term investments - 1,233
------------ ------------
Total cash and short-term investments 6,750 10,306
Accounts receivable, net 2,804 2,297
Prepaid expenses and other current assets 398 545
------------ ------------
Total current assets 9,952 13,148

Property and equipment 389 524
Other assets 115 346
------------ ------------
Total assets $ 10,456 $ 14,018
============ ============

LIABILITIES AND SHAREHOLDERS' EQUITY

Current liabilities:
Accounts payable $ 2,248 $ 2,655
Accrued expenses 2,672 3,094
Deferred revenue 245 128
------------ ------------
Total current liabilities 5,165 5,877

Commitments and contingencies

Shareholders' equity:
Common stock 7 7
Paid-in capital 203,578 203,059
Treasury stock (6,334) (6,334)
Accumulated other comprehensive loss - (1)
Accumulated deficit (191,960) (188,590)
------------ ------------
Total shareholders' equity 5,291 8,141
------------ ------------
Total liabilities and shareholders'
equity $ 10,456 $ 14,018
============ ============



Investor Relations Contact:
Jennifer Jarman
The Blueshirt Group
415-217-7722
Email Contact

SOURCE: InsWeb

AIG Looks to Acquire Outstanding Shares of Auto Insurer 21st Century

American International GroupAmerican International Group, Inc. (AIG) has submitted a letter to the board of directors of 21st Century Insurance Group proposing to acquire the outstanding 38.1 percent publicly held shares of 21st Century for $19.75 per share in cash.

AIG and its subsidiaries own approximately 61.9 percent of the outstanding shares of 21st Century. The aggregate cash consideration payable would be approximately $690 million. Following the transaction, 21st Century would become a wholly owned subsidiary of AIG.

Founded in 1958, 21st Century is a direct-to-consumer provider of personal auto insurance. With $1.4 billion of revenue in 2005, the company insures 1.5 million vehicles in 17 states (Arizona, California, Colorado, Florida, Georgia, Illinois, Indiana, Minnesota, Missouri, Nevada, New Jersey, Ohio, Oregon, Pennsylvania, Texas, Washington and Wisconsin).

The proposed per share price represents a 19.0 percent premium to yesterday's closing price and a 25.5 percent premium to the average closing price during the last 12 months. The proposed per share price also represents a multiple of 19.6x the consensus estimates of 21st Century's 2007 earnings per share (based on a current First Call estimate of $1.01 per share).

"Our proposal represents an excellent opportunity for 21st Century's shareholders to monetize their investment at a full and fair value for their shares. For AIG, this is an opportunity to make a substantial additional investment in a business we know well," said Martin J. Sullivan, president and chief executive officer of AIG.

AIG contemplates that the transaction would be implemented through a merger agreement which would be negotiated and approved by a special committee comprised of directors of 21st Century who are independent of AIG. This proposal is subject to AIG's satisfactory completion of due diligence and satisfaction of regulatory requirements.

AIG has advised 21st Century that AIG's sole interest is in acquiring the remaining shares of 21st Century held by the public shareholders and that it has no interest in a disposition of its controlling equity stake in 21st Century.

Source: American International Group, Inc.

Thursday, January 25, 2007

Farmers Insurance Offers Discount on Auto Insurance to Men and Women of Armed Forces

Men and Women of Armed ForcesTOPEKA, Kan.--(BUSINESS WIRE)--Farmers Insurance Group of Companies announced today that men and women currently serving in the armed forces can save 5% on their automobile insurance with Farmers in Kansas.

"These are men and women who risk their lives for all Americans every day," said Frank Soldano, State Executive Director of Farmers, Kansas. "Farmers would like to show our gratitude by offering a discount on auto insurance to all Kansans now serving our country."

In Kansas, Farmers insures more than 95,000 homes, over 236,000 automobiles, 3,500 businesses and the lives of over 30,000 people.

Farmers Insurance Group of Companies® is the nation's third-largest Personal Lines Property & Casualty insurance group. Headquartered in Los Angeles and doing business in 41 states, the insurers comprising the Farmers Insurance Group of Companies provide Homeowners, Auto, Business, Life insurance and financial services to more than 10 million households through 17,000 exclusive and independent agents and district managers. For more information about Farmers, visit our Web site at www.farmers.com.

Contact:
Farmers Insurance Group
Michelle Levy, 512-791-7445
Jerry Davies, 323-932-3662

Source: Farmers Insurance Group

Cheap auto insurance: Fact or fiction

Cheap auto insuranceBy Sarah MacIntyre

Time and time again motorists in B.C. are regaled with horror stories of private auto insurance rate hikes and reassured they enjoy the lowest premiums thanks to the government run ICBC.

Unfortunately for the B.C. government no matter how many tales they tell a recent study separates fact from fiction about auto insurance in Canada. The report “Myths and Facts about Automobile Insurance in Canada” was prepared by former Canadian Taxpayers Federation (CTF) director Mark Milke for the Insurance Bureau of Canada.

Myth #1: Private sector auto insurance is more costly than government-provided insurance.

Milke’s research reveals that between 2000 and 2005, the average British Columbia premium ranged from the most expensive among the 10 provinces.

The same holds true for Manitoba where the government provides auto insurance.

In Alberta the private sector, not government is in the auto insurance business. And most anecdotal reports shore up the myth that private insurance is more expensive than government. But according to the data, B.C.’s premiums were higher than Alberta in every year between 2000 and 2005 except in 2003 when B.C.’s average premium was $2 less than Alberta’s.

Myth #2: Insurance quotes are the same as premiums paid.

There is a reason why most of the motorists and public at large believe that private auto insurance is more expensive than government provided insurance. Reports and studies on insurance are released without full disclosure or adequate context. Milke notes one such example in his study.

The Consumers’ Association of Canada (CAC) claims to estimate insurance costs in each province and then ranks them. However, the CAC simply averages insurance quotes to come up with its insurance cost figure.

What’s wrong with this approach? It doesn’t measure actual premiums paid it merely averages quotes not insurance costs, as it purports. For those provinces that enjoy private sector competition a broader set of pricing will be available because there is also a broader selection of insurance providers and options. An average of such quotes does not provide any indicator of insurance costs.

By Milke’s calculations, the CAC 2005 report exaggerated Alberta’s average premium by 67.7 per cent and Ontario’s by 80.7 per cent because it used quotes and not the actual premiums paid.

Myth #3: Province to province comparisons are like apples to apples comparisons.

Legal restrictions and regulations in each province affect the cost of providing insurance. Milke’s report also notes that the relative wealth of a population, type of optional coverage purchased, accident rates, demographics all impact the cost of providing auto insurance.

The myth of cheaper government auto insurance is just that, a myth.

source: www.abbynews.com

Tuesday, January 23, 2007

New insurance service for VW customers

Volkswagen GroupThe Volkswagen Group has announced that a new insurance service is to be made available to its customers, with individually branded motor insurance products for five of its brands to be administered by Zurich.

Customers of Audi, Seat, Skoda Auto, Volkswagen and Volkswagen Commercial can access the range of insurance, which includes a complimentary seven-day cover option.

Volkswagen described the development as a "strategic move" and said it was designed to ensure that its insurance service is able to provide retailer networks and customers with a range of competitive products.

Graham Wheeler, managing director of the group, said: "We felt that it was necessary for us to be able to offer the drivers of Volkswagen Group vehicles one of the best services and most comprehensive motor insurance products available in the market.

"With this in mind we conducted a major review of the market and our previous products and concluded that Zurich would be the right organisation for us to work with."

The insurer’s commercial approach is "well aligned" to the brand values of Volkswagen, Mr Wheeler added.

Adrian Saunders of Zurich described the agreement as an "exciting new deal" and said it was being seen as an opportunity to develop a long-term relationship between the two firms.

source: www.vcars.co.uk

Insurance discount tied to auto data

Progressive auto insuranceJoel J. Smith / The Detroit News

Progressive, which sells auto insurance directly to consumers over the phone and on the Internet, is offering Michigan drivers a program that will allow them to pay lower premiums by driving less and during non-peak hours.

TripSense, a program started in Minnesota in 2004 that now has 6,000 participants, can save drivers up to 25 percent off their premium depending upon how much and when they drive, according to the Progressive Direct Group of Insurance Companies.

But there's a catch: The device drivers must install on their cars to record mileage also collects information about vehicle speed, acceleration and braking. Progressive says that information is not used to calculate the insurance premiums, but to better understand what causes accidents.

Still consumer privacy advocates question the motives of a car insurance company providing a monitoring device -- on a voluntary basis -- that collects more than just the car's mileage.

"I don't like the creeping invasion of these devices that collect a whole lot of data the insurance company tries to comfort us into believing it won't use," said Doug Heller, executive director of the Foundation for Taxpayer & Consumer Rights in California. "The insurance company is trying to get their hooks in on what should remain private information."

Consumer advocates said they had little problem with collecting only mileage. Their suspicion is the other data could be use to justify rate increases or be sold to marketers.

The small data-logging device plugs into the vehicle's onboard diagnostic port, usually located underneath the steering column.

Just before a vehicle owner's insurance policy expires, he must download the data into a personal computer through a USB port. The owner can see the report, which details how the vehicle was driven and the premium savings -- if any -- they can receive. The owner then decides whether to send the data to Progressive.

The average discount among TripSense customers in Minnesota is 11 percent to 12 percent annually, Progressive said.

Patrick O'Malley, Progressive product manager for Michigan, said that other than mileage and time of day the vehicle is in use, the other data will not be used to calculate insurance premiums. And he said the data won't be sold to a third party for marketing purposes.

"Potentially, consumers can be concerned about all the data we're collecting, so that's why the program is optional," O'Malley said. "But some people want to be rewarded for driving less. The only way you can do this is by providing verified mileage."

O'Malley said the additional data will be used to refine the science of premium pricing. He said the hope is that the data will help Progressive understand factors that can predict future losses.

Michigan and Oregon joined the company's test marketing program last month. No expansion is planned until the results from those states are analyzed.

Data from the National Association of Insurance Commissioners shows the average Michigan driver pays $980 a year for insurance. A 25 percent discount could mean an annual savings of $245.

"Once they start collecting more data than how many miles you drive each year, it really deserves much more public policy debate," Heller said.

"If these devices can collect the data, there is no doubt in my mind the insurance company will use or sell the data. I find it offensive."

You can reach Joel J. Smith at (313) 222-2556 or jsmith@detnews.com.

source: www.detnews.com

Patrick Halts Romney's Auto Insurance Revamp

Governor Deval Patrick

Copyright:The Boston Globe
Source:Boston Globe, The (KRT)
Wordcount:579

Jan. 20--Governor Deval Patrick yesterday put on hold a major auto insurance initiative of former Governor Mitt Romney and disclosed plans to launch a broad overview of the state's heavily regulated system.

Cyndi Roy, the governor's spokeswoman, said Patrick plans to form a study group next week that will report back within 60 days on what steps the administration should take. She said everything would be on the table.

"It's not narrowly focused," Roy said of the panel's mission. "Ultimately, the governor wants to do what's in the best interest of consumers."

The state's auto insurers have been waging a fierce battle over the industry's regulatory framework for several years, with Romney and most insurers urging less state regulation and more competition and the state's biggest auto insurers pressing for the status quo. The state is the only one in the nation where regulators set auto insurance rates.

At the end of his administration, Romney's insurance commissioner pushed through a sweeping change in the way drivers that no insurer wants to insure are apportioned among companies. Romney saw the creation of a so-called assigned risk plan, where as many as a million drivers would be assigned to carriers, as a preliminary first step toward a competitive rate-setting environment. He was supported by former Attorney General Thomas F. Reilly.

After taking office, Patrick fired Romney's insurance commissioner, Julianne M. Bowler, and yesterday ordered the acting commissioner to put rules implementing Bowler's assigned risk plan on hold for 90 days. The acting commissioner, Joseph G. Murphy, said he was acting under rules that allow a commissioner to put a rule on hold if its application would be "unfair, unreasonable, or inconsistent with public policy." He scheduled a hearing on the matter for Feb. 12.

Patrick said little about auto insurance during his campaign for governor, although he indicated he would be reluctant to blow up the existing system. Employees at Commerce Insurance Co. of Webster, the state's biggest auto insurer and the leading opponent of the Romney administration's proposed changes, were strong financial supporters of Patrick during the campaign.

Roy said no decisions have been made about whether the existing system needs to be changed or how it would be changed. She said the study group would review what other states do and analyze the current system and report back to Patrick within 60 days. She said she did not know who would be heading the study group.

Frank O'Brien, vice president and regional manager for the Property Casualty Insurers Association of America, which supported Romney's efforts to revamp the system, said the delay in implementing the assigned risk plan was "disappointing but not unexpected given the pressures that reform opponents have put on the new administration." He said the assigned risk plan was needed to distribute high-risk drivers among companies more equitably.

"We are hopeful that during this 90-day review period that the Patrick administration will have a desire to become more knowledgeable concerning the insurance crisis in Massachusetts with an eye toward making an informed decision about how to best service the citizens of the Commonwealth," O'Brien said in his statement.

Stephen D'Amato, a consultant to the Center for Insurance Research in Cambridge and a former insurance regulator, said Patrick is doing what many people expected him to do, take a close look at the industry.

"It's a sound policy decision by the governor. He obviously wants his administration to take a serious look at the issue," he said.

Pennsylvania Insurance Department Reminds Consumers to Annually Review Auto Insurance Needs

Pennsylvania Insurance DepartmentHARRISBURG, Pa., Jan. 22 /PRNewswire-USNewswire/ -- The Pennsylvania Insurance Department today reminded consumers to annually review their auto insurance needs, highlighting recent studies suggesting that up to one-third of all drivers have not reviewed or updated their auto insurance in the past year.

"While most motorists realize they need to keep their vehicle in good operating condition, many drivers fail to understand the importance of maintaining appropriate insurance coverage - especially for their own financial security," Insurance Commissioner Diane Koken said.

Koken said when examining their insurance needs, consumers should consider such factors as the age of the vehicle, whether comprehensive coverage is needed, the level of their deductible, the availability of discounts and other factors that may change over time.

In Pennsylvania, drivers are required to carry medical benefits, bodily injury liability and property damage liability coverage. Optional coverages - including comprehensive, collision, uninsured and/or underinsured motorist coverage and the choice of full or limited tort - help a consumer customize their insurance policy and tailor it to their specific needs.

All consumers should keep in mind these factors when evaluating their auto insurance needs:

-- Shop around and compare rates from different insurance companies.
-- In some cases, an insurance company may offer a multi-policy discount if a consumer purchases both auto and homeowners coverage.
-- Ask about discounts for cars that are equipped with safety features, such as anti-lock brakes, anti-theft devices and automatic seat belts.
-- If you have a teenage driver on your auto policy, ask about discounts for good students and young driver safety programs.

The latest edition of Consumer News You Can Use, the quarterly newsletter from the department's Office of Consumer Liaison, highlights auto insurance. In addition, the department produces a free brochure titled, "A Consumer's Guide to Auto Insurance." The guide compares rates for the top 20 private passenger auto carriers by region, making it simple for consumers to compare prices. Both publications are available through the Insurance Department's Web site, http://www.insurance.state.pa.us/ .

Consumers with questions may contact the Pennsylvania Insurance Department's automated consumer hotline at 1-877-881-6388, or call any of the Bureau of Consumer Services' regional offices: Harrisburg - (717) 787-2317; Philadelphia - (215) 560-2630; or Pittsburgh - (412) 565-5020.

Source: Pennsylvania Insurance Department

Monday, January 22, 2007

Cheap Car Insurance Quote For A Lady

lady auto InsuranceIf two people walk into a car insurance agency – a lady and a gentleman – looking to purchase cheap car insurance, chances are the lady is going to walk out of the car insurance agency with a cheaper car insurance quote than the quote the gentleman will be offered. Why? A multitude of reasons, really. Statistics show that lady drivers tend to be safer drivers than men drivers, and are therefore seen as less of a risk to insure than men drivers.

So how can a man driver get the same cheap car insurance quote that a lady driver gets? Perhaps the most important change a man can make – other than learning how to put the toilet seat down before leaving the restroom – is how he shops for a car.



The motor vehicle-related accidents that lady drivers are involved in often don’t cause as much damage as motor vehicle-related accidents men drivers are involved in. A major reason these motor vehicle-related accidents cause less damage is because they are safe vehicles. Of course, the driving habits of whomever is behind the wheel undoubtedly plays a huge roll is how much damage is caused in a motor-vehicle accident; however, these days car manufacturers are offering us safer, more dependable and reliable vehicles than ever before.

Cars today compared to the cars of yesteryear have more dependable breaks, air bags for all passengers, and are built sturdier. These factors and many more help ensure that less damage will be caused to the drivers, passengers, and vehicles (at least the safer vehicle) involved in the motor vehicle-related accident. Since lady drivers statistically drive these kinds of cars more often than not, car insurance companies tend to give them cheap car insurance quotes.

So, the next time a man driver heads out to spend a sunny Saturday at the local dealerships, he should have safe cars on his list rather than flashy, yet unreliable, cars.

Cheap tires

Source: ezine-articles-planet.com

Patrick plans to review auto insurance system

auto insurance systemBy David Weber THE ASSOCIATED PRESS

BOSTON— Gov. Deval L. Patrick plans to comprehensively review the state auto insurance system after the acting insurance commissioner yesterday suspended rules changes made in the system during the final weeks of the Romney administration.

On Dec. 13, then-Insurance Commissioner Julianne Bowler approved a new method for assigning high-risk drivers to automobile insurers that aligned Massachusetts with most other states — a move fought by Massachusetts’ largest auto insurer but embraced by a coalition of rivals. The decision capped a four-year-long process that was slowed after Webster-based Commerce Insurance Co. filed a court challenge in January 2005, when Bowler initially approved the plan.

Yesterday, Acting Insurance Commissioner Joseph G. Murphy suspended Bowler’s changes, which were to have taken effect in April.

“I have taken this action in order to consider the impact of the Dec. 13, 2006, order and both the short- and long-term implications of those rules on the Massachusetts private passenger automobile market, with the least disruption to consumers and the insurance industry,” Murphy said in a brief statement.

Patrick applauded the move.

“The governor wants the opportunity to take a look not just at this initiative, but at the entire automobile insurance system in Massachusetts,” Patrick spokesman Kyle Sullivan said. “Next week, the governor will be putting together a study group to investigate this issue and provide advice to us within the next 60 days.”

State law requires Murphy to act on the rule suspension within 90 days. A public hearing is set for Feb. 15.

Bowler had said the Dec. 13 plan would more fairly distribute high-risk drivers among insurers, while also reducing losses and fraud to help keep consumer rates low.

Before Bowler’s ruling, Massachusetts assigned agents representing high-risk drivers to insurance companies, and then allowed the companies to assign individual drivers to a pool where losses were shared among carriers in the state’s so-called “residual market.”

The Dec. 13 plan included a so-called “clean in three” provision to remove drivers from the high-risk pool after a three-year period in which an individual maintains continuous insurance coverage and isn’t found to be at fault for an accident or traffic violation.

Critics argued the previous system was susceptible to gamesmanship and fraud as drivers moved in and out of the high-risk pool, with some companies ending up with a disproportionate share and others dumping drivers they didn’t want to insure into the pool.

Auto-insurance fraud task forces increasing discounts for drivers

Auto insurance fraudBy Hillary Chabot, Transcript Statehouse Bureau

BOSTON — Drivers in communities with an auto-insurance fraud task force will see a higher average auto insurance discount than the rest of the state.

Daniel Johnston, executive director of the Automobile Insurers Bureau of Massachusetts, said the task forces have brought down high auto insurance rates all over the state.

"The reduction this year is largely attributable to these task forces, particularly in communities like Lowell, who have been fighting insurance fraud," said Daniel Johnston, executive director of the Automobile Insurers Bureau of Massachusetts. "I've always said if we take fraud out of the system, we could get rates down."

Experienced drivers with standard coverage in the rest of the state will see an 11.7 percent reduction and will pay about $114 less, according to the bureau. But Lowell drivers will see about $216 knocked off their insurance bills, or a 15.2 percent reduction. Good drivers who renew their policy before April won't see the savings until they renew next year, Johnston said.

Lawrence had the highest reduction in the state at 24 percent. Dorchester had a 17.8 percent cut, and Springfield a 17.7 percent cut. Currently, 12 cities have task forces devoted to decreasing insurance fraud, and those cities represented the bulk of insurance claim decreases, Johnston said. The 12 cities had a $192 million reduction in insurance claims last year, and the entire state had a $300 million reduction, he said.

A new task force will be added in Worcester within the month, according to Johnston, who said cities such as Pittsfield and North Adams probably won't get a task force because auto insurance fraud isn't a big issue in the Berkshires.

Thursday, January 11, 2007

30 million cars now record drivers' behavior

auto techBy Eric C. Evarts, The Christian Science Monitor

It was only a matter of time. For several years, electronic devices in cars have monitored acceleration and braking to save fuel and improve safety. Now, they're saving some of that data to give automakers and police a better idea of how you drive.

So far most of the devices record the last five seconds of readings before a crash, for example, a little like flight-data recorders in airplanes. The information has proven extremely useful to auto designers and accident investigators. It's also being used to prosecute drivers.

"The problem is most people don't realize these devices are in their vehicle," says Eric Skrum, spokesman for the National Motorists Association in Madison, Wis. "That information can be used against you, and there's no sort of regulation about who owns that information."

Already, drivers have had data from their own cars used to convict them. Last month, Danny Hopkins of New York was sentenced to 5 to 15 years in prison for killing Lindsay Kyle after the black box in his Cadillac CTS indicated the car was going 106 miles per hour five seconds before the crash. Investigators originally thought the car was going only 65 to 70 miles per hour. In St. Louis, Clifton McIntire of Phippsburg, Me., pleaded guilty to manslaughter last month after the black box in his GMC pickup revealed that he was going 85 miles an hour before he slammed into the back of a Toyota.

Today an estimated 30 million cars contain these "black boxes" — they're actually silver — known as event data recorders (EDRs). Most record simple data such as whether airbags deployed or if passengers wore seatbelts. But most cars from General Motors and Ford, as well as some Toyotas and Hondas, track even more information, including vehicle and engine speed, and whether the driver was accelerating or braking.

Automakers say they want this information to help improve safety equipment. "The main purpose of the EDR is to get data after a crash to help us understand how the airbags worked," says Alan Adler, manager of product-safety communications at General Motors in Warren, Mich. "The privacy of our customers is very important to us, but [the device] doesn't record anything that isn't true."

Crash investigations

Without EDRs, investigators frequently don't have enough data to pinpoint the cause of an accident, says Joe Osterman, director of the Office of Highway Safety at the National Transportation Safety Board (NTSB) in Washington. That was the case when an elderly man killed 20 people when his Buick plowed into a farmers market in Santa Monica, Calif. in 2000. The driver said he was braking. Witnesses and investigators said he was accelerating.

While what exactly happened in the moments before the tragedy remains a mystery, the NTSB went on record afterward saying EDRs should be mandatory in all cars sold in the United States.

The NTSB, however, doesn't have the authority to mandate black boxes. The National Highway Traffic Safety Administration does. It proposes that the recorders become standard equipment starting in 2009 models, retain the last eight seconds of data before a crash, and include added data from electronic stability control and antilock braking systems.

Civil libertarians worry that such data will be used more broadly in the future.

"This is another example of where technology has outstripped the law and certain assumptions of how the world works," says Jay Stanley, director of communications for the Technology and Liberty Project at the American Civil Liberties Union in New York.

Some safety experts also worry about the wrong people using the data. While Mr. Osterman of the NTSB favors police investigators using black-box data in criminal investigations, he worries that private experts hired in civil litigation may have biases and could take the data at face value instead of cross-checking it.

"The data can be misleading if you're not a seasoned accident reconstructionist," adds Bob Kreeb, an engineer at Booz Allen Hamilton in Washington who chaired a committee of the Society of Automotive Engineers to set standards for the data gathered from black boxes. "So it needs to be interpreted and validated."

Installing black boxes with five seconds worth of memory was as simple as adding a memory chip to existing computer systems in cars. Increasing the memory to several months' worth of data would not be difficult at all, Mr. Stanley says. "If GM decided tomorrow to track three months of data instead of five seconds, there's nothing that would make them have to tell anybody," he adds.

Tracking the teens

In fact, Davis Instruments of Hayward, Calif., sells a black box called CarChip that will record throttle position and engine parameters for up to 300 hours of driving. Parents can use it to monitor their teenagers' driving habits, for example.

Progressive, an auto-insurance company, is running a pilot program with 5,000 drivers in Minnesota using a device similar to CarChip. It records up to six months of driving data, including vehicle mileage, time of day, and speed. The program, called TripSense, lets drivers choose whether to hand over data from their recorders to the insurer. Based on their habits behind the wheel, they can get discounts on their premiums of 5 to 25%.

But once any data is collected, some worry that it might be subpoenaed. If a police officer pulls you over while you're not speeding, "will your EDR tell him that five miles or five days earlier you were?" asked AutoWeek magazine's Bob Gritzinger in a November article.

Recorder data may also present problems for drivers with automobile warranties. Some wonder if vehicle manufacturers are using safety data to void warranties. Some people in Internet chat rooms have alleged Mitsubishi is doing just that to those who drive its racy Evolution VIII in amateur weekend races.

Even if not true, the existence of such stories shows people's concerns about this kind of technology, says Stanley. "If it's not controlled, it allows powerful institutions to increase their control over ordinary individuals," he says.

For example: When AutoWeek conducted handling tests on a mundane Chevy Malibu Maxx hatchback earlier this year, the recorder automatically alerted GM OnStar officials, who called the car to make sure the driver was OK after a particularly severe cornering maneuver. The driver was, but later said he resented the intrusion.

Governor seeks insurance for all

Proposal to ensure coverage of Californians requires businesses and individuals to share the costs.
Los Angeles Daily News

SACRAMENTO -- Gov. Arnold Schwarzenegger proposed Monday a sweeping plan to insure the health of all Californians by forcing most businesses to cover their employees and all individuals to obtain coverage through work or on their own.

The Republican governor's proposal puts the state at the forefront of national efforts to reform the health-care system.

His plan would provide health coverage to the estimated 6.5 million Californians -- legal and illegal residents -- who are uninsured and put the cost burden on everyone else.

In calling for "shared responsibility" to solve the health-care crisis, Schwarzenegger's proposal demands big contributions from some of the most powerful business and health interests in the state.

"We will fix California's broken health-care system," Schwarzenegger pledged in an announcement televised by closed circuit from Los Angeles, where he is nursing a broken leg. "And create a model that can be used by the rest of the nation."

Experts noted that Massachusetts passed universal health coverage legislation last year, but said California's size and the number of people without coverage -- who are poorer than Massachusetts' uninsured -- make the task more daunting.

"It would certainly make California the leader in the nation among states in addressing the problems of health care that Congress and the Bush administration have refused to address," said E. Richard Brown, director of the UCLA Center for Health Policy Research.

The proposal would require all Californians to have insurance, similar to the way drivers must obtain auto insurance, employing a multi-prong strategy to reach universal coverage.

Businesses with 10 or more employees would have to provide health coverage for their workers or contribute a 4 percent payroll payment -- a "pay-or-play" concept previously rejected by Schwarzenegger. Insurers and hospitals would have to devote 85 cents of every dollar in premiums and health spending to patient care.

Eligibility rules for the state's health program for the poor would be eased in order to cover all uninsured children, including those of illegal immigrants.

The plan also includes new costs for hospitals and doctors, which would have to pay 4 percent and 2 percent of their gross revenues to the state, respectively.

It would take away $2 billion in state money that county hospitals receive for indigent care and use it to insure more people in Medi-Cal, the state health insurance program for the poor.

In return, Schwarzenegger wants to boost historically low reimbursement rates for Medi-Cal to doctors and hospitals.

And he argued that the insurance mandate would bring millions of new customers to insurers, softening the blow of other aspects of the plan.

"Everyone is left with a better deal here, even though everyone has to chip in," the governor said.

In Los Angeles County, which has faced numerous hospital closures in recent years and massive numbers of uninsured patients, reaction from health-care advocates and experts was mixed. Some said the plan would slow the rate of hospital closures, but others said it could also lower the quality of care.

About 25 percent of adults and 15 percent of children are without insurance in Los Angeles County, according to a recent study by the Public Policy Institute of California.

Keeping county hospitals open

Barbara Siegel, managing attorney for consumer health for Neighborhood Legal Services of Los Angeles County, praised the governor's plan, saying it was likely to slow hospital closures and provide more coverage for low-income families.

By increasing the Medi-Cal reimbursements by $2 billion statewide, requiring all individuals to have insurance and requiring insurers to provide coverage, she said, more hospitals will be able to afford to stay open and keep their emergency rooms functioning. In 2004 alone, six hospitals closed in the county, she said.

"We have had a rash of hospital closures and particularly emergency room closures in Los Angeles County," Siegel said. "The providers continually say that because of federal law, they have to accept all comers in the ER without regard to the ability to pay or insurance coverage.

"I do think this will help the hospitals and eventually lower the cost of health coverage premiums."

Also, by requiring insurance companies to provide coverage, she said, it will prevent a problem she has seen of insurers retroactively denying coverage for someone after they develop an expensive medical problem.

Dr. Ralph Di Libero, president of the Los Angeles County Medical Association, supports the emphasis on prevention of health problems and the expansion of coverage for children. But he said the governor did not provide adequate funding sources for all the services he wants to provide.

He also thinks it starts to create a two-tier system of medical service delivery, in which those at the lower income levels are more commonly treated by nurse practitioners and physician assistants, rather than the doctors themselves.

The wording in the governor's written proposal calls for "expansion of lower-cost models of health care delivery such as retail-based medical clinics by making scope of practice changes for 'physician extenders' such as nurse practitioners and physician assistants."

Di Libero said he fears that model could lead to inadequate treatment for low-income patients.

"They'll hand them over to a system where we physicians are really not involved," Di Libero said. "(Physician extenders) are trained to be supervised. Now they're going to do all this without physician oversight -- and I think physician oversight is absolutely necessary."

The county, he said, is facing serious problems, as it is averaging one emergency room closure every year. In the past two years alone, two ERs serving 100,000 patient visits a year closed in South Los Angeles.

GOP concern over immigrants

Republican lawmakers remain concerned about the governor's plan to provide coverage for illegal immigrants.

"We do not believe the best use of taxpayer dollars is to provide taxpayer-funded health insurance for illegal immigrants," said Sen. George Runner, R-Lancaster, vice chairman of the Senate Health Committee, in a written statement. "There is a difference between allowing everyone access to health care and forcing taxpayers to pay for health insurance for illegal immigrants -- health insurance that may be better than what many citizens have access to."

He said Senate Republicans plan to introduce their own health-care proposal later this month.

Officials with the Los Angeles County Department of Health Services are still analyzing the governor's plan, but gave it preliminary positive reviews. Department spokesman Michael Wilson said the agency supports universal coverage and any means to expand health-care coverage and access.

"The department applauds the governor's effort to take a bold step in redefining the health-care delivery system and making health care a priority on the state agenda," Wilson said in a written statement. "The department further supports the plan's inclusion of coverage for California's undocumented population as we seek to manage chronic illness and decompress an overburdened emergency system."

The Legislature's most powerful Democrat, Assembly Speaker Fabian Nunez, D-Los Angeles, gave the Republican governor's plan a glowing review.

"I can tell you today with certainty that in 2007 the California Legislature and the governor will produce health-care reform that ensures that each and every Californian has access to a good health-care coverage in this state."

Nunez's counterpart in the state Senate, Democrat Don Perata of Oakland, was more guarded, saying there were encouraging parts of the plan but that he wanted more details.

Schwarzenegger may have a harder time winning over Republicans, although his aides insisted that the plan would need a majority, not a two-thirds, vote. If that opinion holds up, it could diminish the role of Schwarzenegger's own party in the debate.

Still, health-care reform is notoriously complex and difficult to achieve, affecting an array of savvy, well-heeled interests. Business, health-industry, labor and consumer groups went out of their way to praise the governor's ambitions and certain components of his plan, but are almost certain to step up their opposition to planks they deem harmful.

Labor and consumer groups zeroed in on the individual insurance mandate, arguing that it would saddle hundreds of thousands of residents who don't get insurance at work with health-insurance bills they can't afford.

"It's a tax on the middle class," said Art Pulaski, executive secretary-treasurer of the California Labor Federation.

source: www.dailybreeze.com

Wednesday, January 10, 2007

Insurance bill proposed by Republican legislators falls short of campaign promises

insurance lawBy Mark Hollis
Tallahassee Bureau

TALLAHASSEE -- Aiming to give consumers a break from high insurance costs without hurting insurers, Senate Republicans on Monday outlined an approach that gives the industry a financial break that they hope will result in lower rates.

The cautious approach by Senate Republicans fails to guarantee rate rollbacks as many officials promised during the campaign season, but goes further toward helping homeowners than what some insurers may tolerate.

The plan surfaced just as a national consumer group lambasted the insurance industry for overpricing and big profits, and called on lawmakers to tighten industry regulations. That push for reform comes as Florida lawmakers prepare for next week's special session on insurance. The legislation introduced Monday will be debated in a Senate committee today.

The 153-page Senate Republican package is the first major proposal for the special session. House leaders, Democrats and Gov. Charlie Crist are expected to offer their own proposals.

At the heart of the Senate bill is a proposal to expand the state's hurricane catastrophe fund, which provides low-cost backup funds to private insurers. The change would lower some costs for insurance companies but puts taxpayers at greater risk of bailing out companies if a hurricane strikes.

Among the big beneficiaries of the legislation would be property owners who now can get coverage only from Citizens Property Insurance, the state-backed insurer of last resort. The bill would rescind a 56 percent Citizens rate hike that took effect Jan. 1, and would hand rebate checks to homeowners who've already been hit with that charge.

The bill would bolster Citizens further by allowing it to sell "all perils" coverage in so-called "high-risk" zones along the coast. Currently, Citizens can offer only windstorm coverage in those zones, while private insurers can sell lucrative fire and theft policies there.

Besides failing to offer guaranteed rate rollbacks sought by Democrats, the bill doesn't include ideas touted by Crist during his campaign. One of his ideas is to require insurers to sell homeowner's coverage in Florida if they also sell auto insurance policies in this state and homeowner's coverage elsewhere in the country.

Still, the plan received a thumbs-up from the new governor and was labeled even by some Democrats as a promising first step. Despite widespread concerns in Tallahassee over whether officials can craft a deal that pleases homeowners, businesses and politically influential insurers, Crist said he was "encouraged" by chances of a consensus deal being reached and approved.

The Consumer Federation of America, based in Washington, D.C., said it found evidence that insurers nationwide have been overcharging for insurance and shifting costs to consumers and taxpayers. Its report said property and casualty insurers enjoyed nearly $150 billion in profits during the past three years.

Republican lawmakers, especially state House members, have been saying they are under pressure to guarantee bigger industry profits in Florida to turn around losses the companies suffered after storms in 2004 and 2005. But several South Florida Democrats in both the House and Senate said rate reductions must be the state's priority. They noted that, except for Citizens' customers, the Senate Republican plan doesn't guarantee premium rollbacks.

Senate Democratic Leader Steve Geller of Hallandale Beach, who assisted Republican Sens. Bill Posey of Rockledge and Dan Webster of Winter Garden in crafting the bill, said he wants the bill refined to include guaranteed rate relief for most Floridians.

But Posey, lead writer of the Senate Republican plan, said there's a reason the bill doesn't guarantee reductions. He said guarantees would be irresponsible despite the political appeal. Posey said there are many provisions in the bill that should result in rate relief, including the proposal to expand the catastrophe fund.

Critics caution that expanding the fund will cause rates to drop, but people may have to pay later should the fund have a deficit. They're already paying now: For the next decade, Floridians will pay $10 for every $1,000 of premium on their home, life, health and auto policies to cover a $1.55 billion deficit in the Catastrophe Fund.

Given that and other concerns, the insurance industry reacted guardedly to the Senate Republican plan. Sam Miller, executive vice president of the Florida Insurance Council, said it's crucial the Legislature strike a balance between helping consumers and insurers.

"We just hope that the Legislature is very careful in the steps they take to provide rate relief, and that consumers realize it really is pay me now, pay me later," Miller said.

Staff Writer Kathy Bushouse and John Kennedy of the Tallahassee Bureau contributed to this report.

source: www.sun-sentinel.com

Tuesday, January 09, 2007

The Topic: Auto Crashes; December 2006

auto crashWEST ROCKPORT (Jan 8): Auto Crashes

THE TOPIC

DECEMBER 2006

The cost and crashworthiness of vehicles as well as drivers’ safety habits affect the cost of auto insurance. In 2005, 43,443 people died in motor vehicle crashes and an additional 2,699,000 people were injured. Out of concern for public safety and to help reduce the cost of crashes, insurers support safe driving initiatives. In 1969 the insurance industry created the Insurance Institute for Highway Safety, an organization best known for its vehicle crashworthiness testing program. The industry has also fought to get auto manufacturers to make air bags standard equipment in vehicles and is a major supporter of antidrunk driving and seat-belt usage campaigns. Drivers have also contributed to the reduction in crash-related fatalities by demanding safer vehicles.


KEY FACTS


Motor vehicle crashes are the leading cause of death for people ages three to 33.


A motor vehicle death occurs on average every 12 minutes and an injury every 12 seconds. About 119 people died each day in motor vehicle crashes in 2005.


Since the first documented crash death in 1899, more than 30 million people worldwide have died in traffic crashes.



FATALITIES AND INJURIES


Overall: According to the U.S. Department of Transportation's Fatal Analysis Reporting System at the National Highway Traffic Safety Administration (NHTSA), 43,443 people died in motor vehicle crashes in 2005, up 1.4 percent from 42,836 in 2004. The 2005 total was the highest level killed since 1990. NHTSA says that the 2005 increase resulted mainly from a 13.0 percent increase in the number of motorcyclist deaths, which have increased for eight years running (See Motorcycle Crashes paper).


By Vehicle Miles Traveled: The fatality rate — measured as deaths per 100 million vehicle miles traveled — was 1.47 in 2005, up from 1.45 in 2004, the first increase since 1986.


By Crash Type: In 2005 there were 6,159,189 police-reported motor vehicle traffic crashes, down 0.4 percent from 6,181,444 in 2004. Of total crashes, 1,816,000 only caused injuries and 4,304,000 only caused property damage. NHTSA estimates 10 million or more crashes go unreported every year.


Work-Related: In 2005 crashes involving vehicles on public roadways were the leading cause of work-related fatalities, according to the U.S. Bureau of Labor Statistics, accounting for almost a quarter of all fatal work injuries.


By Age Group: In 2005 older people (65 and older) made up 15 percent of all traffic fatalities, 14 percent of vehicle occupant fatalities and 20 percent of pedestrian fatalities. (See Older Drivers paper.) In 2004 there were 28 million older licensed drivers, up from 17 percent in 1994. The total number of drivers rose only 13 percent from 1994 to 2004.

In 2005 drivers between the ages of 15 and 20 accounted for 12.6 percent of all drivers in fatal crashes and for 16 percent of all drivers in police-reported crashes. In 2004 (latest available data) drivers in this age group accounted for 6.3 percent of all licensed drivers. To reduce high accident rates among young drivers, states are increasingly adopting graduated driver license programs, which allow young drivers to improve their skills and driving habits. (See Teen Driving paper).


By Driver Behavior

Speeding: In 2005, 13,113 lives were lost due to speed-related accidents. Speeding was a contributing factor in 30 percent of all fatal crashes. In 2005, 38 percent of 15- to 20-year old male drivers who were involved in fatal crashes were speeding at the time of the crash. NHTSA says that speed-related crashes cost Americans $40.4 billion each year. A crash is considered speed related when the driver is charged with a speed-related offense or a law enforcement officer indicates that exceeding the posted speed limit, driving too fast for conditions or racing was a contributing factor.

Drunk Driving: There is an alcohol-related traffic fatality every 31 minutes and an alcohol-related traffic injury every 2 minutes. In 2005, 16,885 people died in alcohol-related crashes, down 0.2 percent from 16,919 in 2004. Alcohol was involved in 39 percent of all crash fatalities in 2005. (See Drunk Driving paper.) Alcohol-related crashes are defined as those where someone involved, either a driver or a nonoccupant such as a pedestrian or bicyclist, had a traceable amount of alcohol in his or her blood.

Drunk Driving and Speeding: In 2005, 40 percent of intoxicated drivers (with a blood-alcohol content at or above 0.08, the definition of drunkenness) involved in fatal crashes were speeding, compared with 14 percent of sober drivers involved in fatal crashes.

Red Light Running: The Insurance Institute for Highway Safety (IIHS) says that more than 900 people a year die and nearly 2,000 are injured as a result of vehicles running red lights. About half of those deaths are pedestrians and occupants of other vehicles who are hit by red light runners.

Fatigue: NHTSA statistics show that at least 100,000 crashes and 1,500 deaths each year are the result of drivers falling asleep at the wheel. A 2002 poll, conducted by the National Sleep Foundation, found that 100 million drivers, close to half of American adult drivers, drive while drowsy and nearly two out of ten admitted to having fallen asleep at the wheel. New Jersey passed a law in 2003 that equates falling asleep at the wheel with reckless driving, and, if a driver falls asleep and kills someone in a crash, he or she can be charged with vehicular homicide and serve up to ten years in jail and pay fines. Although four states have considered similar legislation, New Jersey is the only state with such a law on the books.


By Vehicle

SUVs: The number of people killed in SUV rollover crashes fell 1.8 percent from 2,929 in 2004 to 2,877 in 2005, according to NHTSA, the first decline since 1992. In 2005 SUVs had the highest occupant fatality rate of any vehicle type in rollover crashes at 8.28 per 100,000 registered vehicles. This compares with 6.97 for pickup trucks, 6.80 for vans and 3.22 for passenger cars.

Motorcycles: In 2005, 4,553 motorcyclists died in crashes, marking the eighth consecutive year of increasing motorcycle deaths and a 13.0 percent increase from 4,028 in 2004. 2005 fatalities were the highest since 1986. In addition, motorcycle rider fatalities increased to 10.5 percent of all motor vehicle crash fatalities, compared with 5.0 percent in 1997. (See Motorcycle Crashes paper.) Between 1997 and 2005, motorcycle fatalities rose 115 percent. In 2004 (latest data available for registration statistics) motorcycles accounted for 2.4 percent of all registered motor vehicles and 0.3 percent of vehicle miles traveled. However, per vehicle mile traveled in 2004, motorcyclists were about 34 times more likely than passenger car occupants to die in a crash and about eight times more likely to be injured.

Large Trucks: According to NHTSA, 5,212 people died in crashes involving large trucks in 2005, compared with 5,235 in 2004, a decline of 0.4 percent. Although large trucks amounted to 3 percent of all registered vehicles in 2004 (latest year available for registration statistics), they accounted for 8 percent of all vehicles involved in fatal crashes in 2005. One out of eight traffic fatalities in 2005 resulted from a collision involving a large truck.



SAFETY


Crashworthiness: Crashworthiness, a term which refers to how well vehicles withstand different types of crashes, varies by category of vehicle as well as by make, model and year. Two groups conduct tests to determine crashworthiness—the Insurance Institute for Highway Safety (IIHS), which is an insurance-funded organization, and the U.S. Department of Transportation’s National Highway Traffic Safety Administration (NHTSA). The IIHS conducts four types of tests on a large variety of vehicles: Low speed crash tests, rear crash protection tests, side impact crash tests and 40-mph frontal crash offset tests. NHTSA conducts two tests that are similar to the IIHS’s—frontal crash and side crash tests. NHTSA also publishes rollover safety ratings by make and model year, and tire ratings by brand. The IIHS vehicle ratings can be found on the Internet at http://www.highwaysafety.org; NHTSA test results can be found at http://www.safercar.gov.


Lives Saved by Safety Devices

Airbags: NHTSA says that airbags saved 2,741 lives in 2005. From 1987 to 2005, 19,659 lives were saved by air bags. Airbags, combined with lap/shoulder belts, are the most effective safety protection available for passenger vehicles. They are designed to inflate in moderate to severe frontal crashes. They are 14 percent effective in reducing fatalities when no seat-belt is used and 11 percent effective with a seat-belt. NHTSA estimates that by 2005, more than 160 million passenger vehicles were equipped with airbags, including 146 million with dual airbags.

Side airbags that protect the head, chest and abdomen reduce driver deaths by an estimated 37 percent, according to the IIHS. Side airbags without head protection, which protect only the chest and abdomen, are less effective but still reduce deaths by about 26 percent, according to a 2006 study. Head-protecting side airbags reduce driver deaths when cars are struck by SUVs and light trucks, an important issue because when cars are struck in the side by these higher riding vehicles, heads are more vulnerable.

Seat-Belts: Among passenger vehicle occupants over the age of four, seat-belts saved an estimated 15,632 lives in 2005. Seat-belts are effective in protecting occupants from ejection, one of the most injurious results of a crash, according to NHTSA. In fatal crashes in 2005, 75 percent of passenger vehicle occupants who were totally ejected from the vehicle were killed. Seat-belts are effective in preventing total ejections. Only 1 percent of occupants reported to have been using restraints were total ejected, compared with 30 percent of unrestrained occupants.

Child Safety Seats: NHTSA says that in 2005 the lives of an estimated 420 children under the age of five were saved by restraints — 382 of them by child safety seats alone. If all children under the age of five had been placed in child safety seats in 2005, another 198 lives could have been saved. From 1975 through 2005, NHTSA estimates that 7,896 lives were saved by restraints (child safety seats or adult seat-belts).

Motorcycle Helmets: Helmets saved 1,546 lives in 2005, according to NHTSA, and could have saved an additional 728 if all motorcyclists had worn helmets. Helmets are estimated to be 37 percent effective in preventing fatal injuries to motorcyclists.


Studies: A study released in April 2006 found that almost 80 percent of crashes and 65 percent of near-crashes involved some form of driver inattention within three seconds of the event. The 100-Car Naturalistic Driving Study, conducted by the Virginia Tech Transportation Institute and the National Highway Traffic Safety Administration (NHTSA), breaks new ground. (Earlier research found that driver inattention was responsible for 25 to 30 percent of crashes.) The new study found that the most common distraction is the use of cell phones, followed by drowsiness. However, cell-phone use is far less likely to be the cause of a crash or near-miss than other distractions, according to the study. For example, while reaching for a moving object such as a falling cup increased the risk of a crash or near-crash by 9 times, talking or listening on a hand-held cell phone only increased the risk by 1.3 times. The study tracked the behavior of the 241 drivers of 100 vehicles for more than one year. The drivers were involved in 82 crashes, 761 near crashes and 8,295 critical incidents. (See also Cell Phones and Driving.)

In December 2005 the NHTSA and the National Center for Statistics and Analysis released the results of their National Occupant Protection Use Survey (NOPUS), which found that in 2005, 6 percent of drivers used handheld cell phones, up from 5 percent in 2004. The survey also found that the jump was most noticeable among women (up to 8 percent from 6 percent in 2004) and young drivers ages 16 to 24 (up to 10 percent from 8 percent in 2004). The percentage of men using cell phones rose from 4 to 5 percent over the same period. Finally, the survey found that the number of drivers using headsets rose from 0.4 percent in 2004 to 0.8 percent in 2005. The NOPUS is a probability-based observational survey. Data on driver cell phone use were collected at random stop signs or stoplights only while vehicles were stopped and only during daylight hours. See also Cell Phones and Driving.

Many studies have shown that using hand-held cell phones while driving can constitute a hazardous distraction. However, the theory that hands-free sets are safer has been challenged by the findings of several studies. A study from researchers at the University of Utah, published in the summer 2006 issue of Human Factors concludes that talking on a cell phone while driving is as dangerous as driving drunk, even if the phone is a hands-free model. An earlier study by researchers at the university found that motorists who talked on hands-free cell phones were 18 percent slower in braking and took 17 percent longer to regain the speed they lost when they braked.



SAFETY ISSUES


Insurer Safety Discounts: Insurers offer discounts to encourage drivers to focus on safety. The majority of states mandate discounts for drivers who have completed approved driver improvement courses, mostly for motorists over the age of 55. Three states require insurers to give discounts, in some cases specifying the actual percentage, for cars equipped with air bags (although they are standard equipment on most cars now) and three require discounts for automatic seat-belts. Florida and New York require insurers to give discounts for cars with antilock brakes. Some insurers have nationwide discounts in place. State Farm, for example, offers as much as a 15 percent discount for drivers under age 25 who complete a safe driving program.


At least two insurers offer insurance discounts to owners of “hybrid” cars, which combine a battery–powered engine with a traditional gas engine. One offers a 10 percent discount on all auto insurance coverages except uninsured motorist and personal injury protection (PIP) for hybrid owners and bases the discount on the driver rather than on a safety device or safety training. According to the insurer, hybrid owners are less risky drivers than the average driver, based on demographics, driving records, credit data, marital status and driving patterns. The other insurer offers a 10 percent discount (5 percent in California) on all major coverages, including uninsured motorists and PIP.


Seat-Belt Use Laws: Seat-belt use laws are on the books in all states except New Hampshire. However, only 24 states and the District of Columbia have primary enforcement laws. The latest state to pass a primary seat- belt law was Mississippi, effective May 27, 2006. Primary seat-belt laws allow law enforcement officers to stop a car for noncompliance with seat-belt laws (See chart in following section). In the other states, which have secondary enforcement laws, drivers may only be stopped, and they and their passangers ticketed, if they have violated other traffic safety laws.

NHSTA says that states with primary enforcement laws have lower fatality rates. The agency compared the percentage of unrestrained passenger vehicle occupant fatalities and fatality rates between states that have primary safety- belt use laws and states that do not have them for 2000–2004. Besides having a smaller percentage of passenger vehicle occupant fatalities that were unrestrained, the fatality rates in primary enforcement states were much lower than for all other states. In primary enforcement states the passenger vehicle occupant fatality rates were 1.03 per 100 million vehicle miles traveled and 10.69 per 100,000 population. This compares to 1.21 and 13.13 (respectively) for all other states.


Seat-belt use in the United States stood at 81 percent in June 2006, compared with 82 percent in 2005, according to NHTSA. New incentives to increase seat-belt use were included in 2005’s Safe, Accountable, Flexible, Efficient Transportation Act. The Act makes $498 million available for distribution over four years to states that enact primary seat-belt laws or reach 85 percent belt use for two years.


source: www.iii.org

Monday, January 08, 2007

Another mild hurricane season would be just fine for insurers

auto insurance hurricaneJerry W. Jackson and Richard Burnett | Sentinel Staff Writers

Prospects for the state's property insurance industry in 2007 are nearly as unpredictable as the weather. Another mild hurricane season would improve its chances of stability. Another bad year could send the industry reeling again.

One safer bet is that the state's insurer of last resort, Citizens Property Insurance Corp., will continue to grow despite efforts to "depopulate," or reduce the number of policyholders served by, the quasi-government operation.

Citizens is projected to have 1.6 million policies by the end of 2007, up from about 1.3 million now, as private insurers continue to drop customers to reduce their exposure to hurricane-related losses, particularly along the state's coastline.

In late 2003, before the state was hammered by a string of hurricanes in 2004 and 2005, Citizens had 820,255 policies in force.

A special session of the Legislature, focused on insurance and set to begin Jan. 16, will set the tone for the year.

The session is likely to produce at least some legislation aimed at easing the insurance-affordability crisis, but "whether it will have enough meat to make much of a difference, it's tough to say," said Stephen Simms, president of Cooper, Simms, Nelson & Mosley in Winter Park.

Simms said he places the odds at "better than 50-50" that several key provisions will pass, including a reduction of the threshold at which insurance companies can gain access to the state's hurricane-catastrophe reinsurance pool, known as the Cat Fund.

The Cat Fund was drained by the 2004 and 2005 hurricane seasons -- after eight hurricanes and nearly $40 billion in insured losses -- and now is being replenished with statewide assessments on policyholders' premiums and with bond money.

Simms said that, if smaller insurers can get easier access to the Cat Fund, in essence lowering their reinsurance cost, "that should help" stabilize the market.

Sam Miller, executive vice president of the Florida Insurance Council, the state's largest insurance trade group, said that any effort to "artificially reduce premiums" would force private insurers to retreat even further. It would be better, he said, if the state controlled coastal development.

"As long as policymakers allow Citizens to be the unwitting substitute for poor land-use decisions, Citizens will continue to grow," Miller said.

Industry officials also oppose reforms being proposed by new Gov. Charlie Crist, especially two measures: One would require any company selling auto insurance in Florida to sell property and casualty insurance also; the other would prohibit property insurers from having Florida-only subsidiaries, which tend to isolate the risk of losses and inflate premiums for Floridians insured by those units.

Crist says such measures could help reduce premiums within the next two years. The industry disputes that, arguing that they would only chase more insurers from the state and drag the problem into the auto-insurance market as well.

Auto insurance in Florida has its own issues to address.

Rampant accident fraud, which the industry says costs more than $1 billion a year in Florida alone, contributes about $250 a year to the average vehicle owner's insurance premium.

The result: Floridians pay an average annual premium of more than $1,015 -- fifth highest in the country, according to the Insurance Information Institute, an industry research group based in New York.

Fraud rings have exploited weaknesses in a state law that requires drivers to have a minimum of $10,000 in personal injury protection coverage. One provision states that companies must pay valid PIP claims within 30 days, giving them little time to investigate potentially false claims.

Florida has focused on the problem, adding fraud investigators and pouring more resources into prosecuting perpetrators. The state hopes such actions, combined with national trends, will provide some relief this year. Nationally, auto-insurance rates are expected to dip for the first time in eight years, according to the Insurance Information Institute.

"I don't see why Florida shouldn't benefit from that trend too, as long as the state continues to get control of its fraud problem," said Walter Dartland, a consumer advocate and former assistant attorney general in Florida.

"Florida has been very proactive in fighting accident fraud," agreed James Quiggle, a spokesman for the Coalition Against Insurance Fraud, a watchdog group based in Washington, D.C. "But it has a ways to go until it reaches a level of success when lawmakers can successfully seek rate decreases. Once the arrests and convictions reach a critical mass, then auto insurers can more comfortably reduce rates."

Jerry W. Jackson can be reached at jwjackson@orlandosentinel.com. Richard Burnett can be reached at rburnett@orlandosentinel.com.


* Net premiums, after certain expenses are deducted.

** Estimates.

SOURCE: Citizens Property Insurance Corp.

Sunday, January 07, 2007

10 Easiest Ways to Lower Your Car Insurance Bill in 2007

car insuranceHappy New Year! As you begin 2007 with a renewed determination to improve your finances, take 10 minutes to analyze your auto insurance bill. Even if last year seemed uneventful, the chances are good that your individual circumstances have changed enough to qualify you for lower car insurance rates. And even if nothing changed on your end, many large insurance companies reduced their rates in 2006.

Don’t overspend on car insurance in 2007: Your potential savings are better used for utility bills, cell phone calling plans, or better yet, personal entertainment. In shopping for a new car insurance policy, use InsWeb’s 10 tips for lowering your rates.

1. Shop and Compare Rates Every 6 Months
In 2007, if you check your car insurance rates in January, make sure your check them again in June. According to an independent study, people who compare rates and switch carriers at InsWeb.com save an average of $301* on a six month policy. Consider the savings over 12 months! Tickets or no tickets, you’re a different driver than you were last summer. Get updated quotes and see what your individual savings could be.

2. Select Higher Deductibles
Simply put, the higher your deductible, the lower your premium. Indeed the cost of an accident will be that much more expensive; however, if the damage is minor (grey zone in making accident claim), you’ll be spending the same out-of-pocket amount regardless.

3. Make a Cheaper Policy Even Cheaper: Don’t Pay in Monthly Installments
Additional administrative fees are commonly applied to payments when you split your premium in to installments (i.e. monthly, semi-annual, annual). Be aware that a monthly fee of even $7 can add up to $84 over 12 months.

4. Look for Multi-Line Insurance Discounts
The most under recognized car insurance discount results from the multi-line insurance policy: buying your auto insurance and your homeowners insurance from the same insurance company. According to the Insurance Information Institute, a multi-line policy can save you up to 15% on both premiums.

5. Collect on Your Good Driving
Most insurance companies reward good driving with lower premiums. In fact, in some states a good driving discount is required by law. If you haven’t had any accidents or tickets in the last three to five years, shop at InsWeb.com and see whether you are missing out on this money savings discount.

6. Don’t Overpay for Tickets
Unfortunately moving violations are an accurate reflection of your liability to an insurance company, and your rates can skyrocket as a result. Perhaps you deserve a higher rate, but don’t let the insurance company unduly punish you. Shop around and see if you can find a more reasonable rate with another company.

7. Look for Safe Vehicle Discount
Many companies offer discounts for various safety features on your vehicle, including air bags, alarms, factory-installed mechanical seatbelts and antilock brakes. In getting updated insurance quotes, be sure to indicate such safety features to benefit from available discounts.

8. Don’t Overpay for Your Unnecessary Coverage
You may be paying for coverage that you don’t need. For example, you may be a member of an auto club that provides towing services, yet you’re also paying for towing on your auto insurance policy. Look for opportunities to eliminate unnecessary costs.

9. Look for a Good Student Discount or Senior Discount
Students currently enrolled in school often receive a discount on auto insurance for good grades, as many companies feel conscientious students make conscientious drivers. Similarly, insurance companies are known to value the wisdom of an experienced driver, offering discounts to drivers over 50 as a result.

10. Pay Less for Driving Less
Many insurance companies will offer discounts on vehicles that incur low annual mileage. In fact, some companies have a predetermined number of what they consider low mileage. Has your commute changed? If so, it might save you money to get an updated quote.

*National average savings information based on InsWeb 6-month policyholder survey data from 4/27/05 to 7/4/05.

source: blog.insweb.com

Important Steps To Follow If You Are In An Auto Accident; Including How To File A Claim

Statistics show that most of us have been involved in an accident, whether or not we were behind the wheel. But of those who have been in an auto accident, how many of us knew offhand the correct steps to follow in this situation? And many auto insurance consumers may not know the quickest and easiest route to filing a claim with your insurance company.

As an educated insurance consumer, you should know the basic steps involved in filing an automobile insurance claim. Accidents are always unexpected, that is why they are called "accidents." While you can't foresee getting into an accident, you can be prepared in case you do. Tip: you might want to clip out this short list and keep it in your car.

In Case of An Accident…

  • At The Scene
    First, stop your vehicle. State laws require persons involved in an accident to stop and exchange information.

Call 911 for police and/or medical assistance. Even if an accident seems minor, assistance may be needed to clear the accident scene, handle traffic, and file an accident report. You may also have stress injuries that come on after the shock wears off. Once the officer and/or medical personnel have finished (and if possible), collect information about the accident at the scene, or as soon after as is practical (you may be able to get a copy of the report filled out by the police officer). This information should include time and place of accident, weather and road conditions, and other circumstances of the accident; as well as names, addresses, telephone numbers, driver's license number and insurance information of those involved (including contact information for any passengers and/or witnesses). You also want to note vehicle information for all cars involved (including make, model, year, color and license plate number) and department and badge numbers of the responding police officer.

  • Filing Your Claim
    Call your insurance company and/or agent as soon as possible. The quicker you report a claim, the quicker the process can get started. Think about it; how many of us can be without our cars for a just a week, not to mention longer? You want to get the insurance process going and repairs done as quickly as possible. Also, the insurer may deny payment of your claim if you do not report the accident within a reasonable period (make sure you read your policy for more details on such a time period).

Make sure your insurance company agrees to pay your claim before you start getting any repairs. They may need to send out an adjuster before approving your claim. You can choose which repair shop to go to unless otherwise stated in your insurance policy (some insurance companies require you go to repair shops approved by them, and may in turn offer you a discount to do so). Check all repairs after they are completed, and keep all receipts associated with the repairs (including an itemized list of exactly what was repaired).


Additional Tips
Make sure you include all the requested information on your insurance application during the initial application process, as an insurer may refuse to pay a claim (not to mention cancel your policy) if they later find that you withheld information that would have caused them to deny you coverage in the first place.

Make sure the insurance company you choose is rated financially strong. If your insurance company is not financially stable and forecloses anywhere near your accident, you may end up paying for most or all of the repairs and medical costs associated with your accident yourself. Although State Insurance Boards will often help if an insurance company legally files bankruptcy, this process takes a long time and payments are often delayed. You can check the financial rating of each insurance company that interests you when going through the quoting process at InsWeb's online marketplace.

source: www.cbs46.com

Hitting deer can be costly without right auto coverage

car hitting deerComprehensive insurance needed to pay for damage


Jeff DeLaney was driving home to Medina, Tenn., over the holidays, when his truck struck a herd of deer, causing what he estimates to be up to $1,600 of damage to his truck.

DeLaney considers himself fortunate to have a comprehensive insurance policy with Farm Bureau Insurance. "I had enough notice that I could slow down, but not enough that I could stop," said the owner of Advantage Lock & Key near Jackson, Tenn.

As many as 40 percent of Tennessee's 4.5 million drivers would have had to pay for the repairs themselves because they don't have comprehensive coverage, under which car insurers pay for such crashes. Some drivers drop comprehensive because they decide their vehicles are too old or of too little value to justify the added cost.

"Many people are not aware that the collision coverage under an automobile insurance policy does not cover you if you hit a deer," Jorge Gomez, Wisconsin's Commissioner of Insurance, said in an article published in USA Today last week.

But Chuck Bidek, executive director of the insurance agents trade group Insurors of Tennessee, said there are more important considerations than the possibility of hitting a deer when deciding whether to get comprehensive insurance coverage.

For consumers who own an older car, the money that they would receive if their car sustained physical damage in an incident might not be worth the premiums, he said.

Statewide, there were 5,109 deer-related vehicle crashes in 2005, including 4,858 that involved property damage, according to the state Department of Safety. That was up 12 percent from 4,553 crashes in 2003, including 4,387 that involved damage.

November, when deer mating and deer hunting seasons start, is the biggest month for incidents.

Urban growth into rural areas plays a role in the increase in incidents, said Mike Browning, a safety department spokesman.

Insurers Allstate and State Farm, two of the biggest car insurers in Tennessee, report a rise in animal-related claims. Last year, State Farm saw 4,190 deer collision claims statewide, up from 3,825 in 2005. Through November 2006, Allstate had seen about 1,014 animal-related claims, up from 800 claims received during all of 2005.

Comprehensive policies statewide rose by 111,077 to 2.7 million between 2001 and 2003, according to the National Association of Insurance Commissioners 2003/2004 Auto Insurance Database Report.

Roughly 80 percent of Allstate's Tennessee auto customers have comprehensive coverage, a percentage unchanged from 2005, said April M. Eaton, its spokeswoman.

Auto Insurance FAQ

source: tennessean.com

Thursday, January 04, 2007

Adding A Teen Driver To Your Insurance Policy? 5 Ways To Keep Costs At Bay

teen driverIn our two-part series addressing teen drivers, last month we focused on safety tips for parents of teen drivers (as well as for teen drivers themselves). This month, we discuss the 5 proven ways of keeping your insurance costs at bay once you add your teen driver.

Fundamentally, the cost of a teen driver’s insurance comes down to earning good grades, maintaining a good driving record, managing deductibles appropriately, selecting the right car, and most of all: simply shopping around for the best policy.

1) Bs or Better = Discounted Rates
Most insurers will offer discounts (often from 10-25%) for teen drivers that maintain a B average or better. This could be seen as an incentive to your teenager to keep those grades up; tell them that if they dip below that B average, their driving privileges will be revoked!

2) Clean Record = Level Prices
Unfortunately, the statistics don’t lie. According to experts, the crash rates for 16 year olds are approximately three times higher than those for 19 year olds, and nearly 6 times higher than for drivers aged 20-24. Many parents find that their new teen drivers are very cautious in the beginning, but then quickly become overconfident and start ignoring basic traffic rules and/or driving recklessly.

Your rates are going to go up when you add your teen driver; but that rate hike will pale in comparison to what they could be if your teen driver gets in an accident, or even gets just one traffic violation (such as for speeding or running a red light). Make sure you impart to your children the importance of driving safely, and remind them that driving is a privilege that can be easily taken away if they cause an accident or ignore traffic laws. Not only will a clean driving record help keep your insurance costs at bay, but it will also give you some peace of mind when your child is behind the wheel.

3) Higher Deductibles = Lower Premiums
Many people may know that raising their deductibles on their insurance policy can save them money, but most don’t feel the need to do this until they realize how much their insurance premiums are going to increase once they add their teen driver to their policy. InsWeb has always advised our consumers that they can achieve significant savings by raising their deductibles. However, all drivers on the policy must be careful not to get into accidents with that higher deductible, as this is the amount that will come out of your pocket before your insurance company starts paying for the rest of the covered damage. If you’ve raised your deductibles (for example from $250 to $1000), make sure to convey to your teen driver that accidents are now double whammies; you will have to pay a lot out of pocket and your insurance costs will then go up (usually significantly). However, if you can avoid any accidents, higher deductibles can afford you considerable savings.

4) Older Cars = Cheaper Insurance
While you might be tempted to buy your teenager a new car with all the latest safety features, remember that newer cars are more expensive to insure. If your insurance company lets you assign drivers to your cars, assign your teen (and have them drive) the oldest car on your policy. And to keep your costs down until you teen driver is older and therefore not costing you as much to insure, you and other drivers on your policy should consider not buying new cars. That way you can keep your premiums down for all the cars covered on your policy.

5) Up-To-Date Information And Shopping Around = Insurance Savings
Lastly, make sure you review your policy at least once a year to make sure all the information is up-to-date. For example, your rates could go down once your teen graduates from high school or turns 18. Or, if your college student does not have a car at college with them (and doesn’t drive when home on holidays), you could take them off your policy. Just make sure they are really not driving, because if your uninsured teen gets in an accident without insurance, that could really cost you.

Most importantly, before you add your teen driver to your existing policy, be sure to compare rates from several companies at InsWeb. Different companies will charge you different rates for adding the new driver, and your existing policy may not offer you the best deal.

source: blog.insweb.com

Wednesday, January 03, 2007

Driver Cell Phone Usage on the Rise

driver cell phoneThe NHTSA (National Highway Traffic Safety Administration) came out with an interesting report earlier in the year which addressed the increasing usage of cell phones in cars. The report states that driver cell phone usage increased in 2005, with 6% of drivers on hand-held phones in 2005 nationwide, compared to 5% in 2004.

The 2005 rate translates into 974,000 vehicles on the road at any given daylight moment being driven by someone on a hand-held phone. It also translates into an estimated 10% of vehicles in the typical daylight moment whose driver is using some type of phone, whether hand-held or hands-free.

The 2005 survey also reported:

• Hand-held cell phone use increased in a number of driver categories, including female drivers (from 6% in 2004 to 8% in 2005), and drivers age 16-24 (8% 2004 to 10% in 2005).

• The incidence of drivers speaking with headsets on while driving also increased in 2005, from 0.4% of drivers in 2004 to 0.7% in 2005.

If you are wondering about the methodology of this research, the report states that trained observers sampled intersections controlled by a stop sign or stoplight, where motorists are observed from the roadside. Data was collected between the hours of 8 a.m. and 6 p.m.

NHTSA: http://www.nhtsa.dot.gov/

Survey: http://www-nrd.nhtsa.dot.gov/pdf/nrd-30/NCSA/RNotes/2005/809967.pdf


source: blog.insweb.com

Bill would impose tougher sentences on auto thieves

auto thievesBy Jerry Cornfield

The Everett Herald

OLYMPIA - Auto thieves would be locked up longer and people caught with the illicit tools of the trade would be punished, under a bill gaining traction among lawmakers.

The bill also could prompt a new program in which car owners allow authorities to stop their vehicle late at night simply to ensure the rightful owner is behind the wheel.

Rep. John Lovick, D-Mill Creek, wrote the bill with 28 Democrats and Republicans signed as co-sponsors. It will be formally introduced when the Legislature starts work Jan. 8.

"People are tired of getting their cars stolen. People are tired of us doing nothing about it," said Lovick, a retired Washington State Patrol sergeant.

An average of 100 or more vehicles is stolen each day in the state. The greatest concentration of thefts - up to 80 percent, Lovick said - is in Snohomish, King and Pierce counties.

There were 35,058 vehicles reported stolen statewide in the first 11 months of 2006, including 5,628 in Snohomish County, said Washington State Patrol Lt. Wes Rethwill.

At that pace, 2006 likely will end up below the 2005 total of 41,293 reported thefts but above the 2004 total of 37,373.

While stealing a vehicle is a felony property crime, existing laws do not dole out heavy punishments.

A first-time offender could spend anywhere from zero to 60 days in county jail, said Tom McBride, executive secretary of the Washington Association of Prosecuting Attorneys.

The range for a second offense climbs to 90 days in county jail. If a person has committed only auto thefts - and is convicted only of that crime - it could take seven convictions before the offender is sent to state prison, he said.

"Historically, it's not been looked at as a consequential occurrence," said Bellingham Police Chief Randy Carroll, president of the Washington Association of Sheriffs and Police Chiefs.

Car thieves tend to commit the crime repeatedly, confident they won't be caught or won't be locked up very long, Snohomish County Prosecuting Attorney Janice Ellis said.

Rethwill said a drop in thefts in 2006 is a sign of increased attention to the problem.

Two recent incidents awoke public awareness.

In November, Seattle police officer Elizabeth Nowak was killed when a convicted car thief on supervised leave from incarceration crashed a stolen Honda into Nowak's private car as she was driving to work. He also died in the crash.

In December, Seattle resident Liam Moynihan received a nine-year state prison term after admitting to stealing 136 cars in a six-month period.

Lovick's proposed law would make stealing any vehicle a first-degree theft, eliminating language that made it a second-degree offense, based on the car's value.

Lovick also wants possession of tools used by car thieves, such as a Slim Jim or a master key, to be a gross misdemeanor.

And the bill would give greater weight to prior convictions for auto theft.

Washington's sentencing rules mete out points for felony convictions. In general, higher offender point totals mean longer prison terms.

With auto theft, each conviction is a point, and at seven points a person could receive a state prison term, McBride said.

The proposed law would triple the point value of prior auto theft convictions.

"That's a good thing because it gets people to prison faster," Ellis said.

McBride called this change the "big kicker" in the law. It could make the bill expensive to implement since more people could land in jail.

On the other hand, he said, auto thieves commit other crimes. Lock them up, and communities will see the number of burglaries and assaults decline, he predicted.

The final piece of Lovick's bill would unite police, prosecutors and residents to raise money for fighting auto theft through law enforcement and public education efforts.

Money would come from a $1 surcharge on each auto insurance policy issued in the state.

Lovick hopes to see the start of a program in which car owners voluntarily put a sticker on their vehicle giving notice that police have permission to randomly stop the car to see who is driving.

Officers now must have cause to stop a car.

In Arizona, where a similar program is run from 1 to 5 a.m. daily, one in seven stops has nabbed an auto thief, Lovick said.

Reporter Jerry Cornfield: 360-352-8623 or jcornfield@heraldnet.com

Auto Insurance Tune-up: Top Mistakes People Make When Buying Auto Insurance

Buying Auto Insurance--(BUSINESS WIRE)--New Year's resolutions are in full swing, and as many people review their financial goals, it's also a great time to give their auto insurance a tune-up. GMAC Insurance, the company that keeps your life moving, reveals the top mistakes people make when shopping for auto insurance and offers tips to help get the most out of your coverage.

1. Shopping for the Lowest Price Available.

We've all heard the claims that we could save money on our auto insurance - but many times, the old adage "you get what you pay for" is true. You should compare not only price, but policy features as well. Many companies offer enhanced benefits, such as superior claims handling, collision parts and customer service guarantees, roadside rental car delivery, replacement car service and online account management. Assess all of the benefits that are included to see the true value you'll be receiving.

2. Underestimating the Value of OEM Parts.

Does your insurance company specify the use of original equipment manufacturer (OEM) replacement parts in collision repairs after accidents? Many companies use less expensive aftermarket parts, which may decrease the value of your car, affect its appearance and jeopardize the warranty. Don't wait until it's too late to find out that your insurance company doesn't use OEM parts.

3. Leaving Yourself Financially Exposed.

Choosing lower liability limits - how much your insurance company will pay for damage to others - can leave you financially exposed. You may pay less, but at what real price? For example, a bad accident that causes serious injury can result in medical bills and lost wages amounting to hundreds of thousands of dollars, which would far exceed minimum liability coverage limits. Make sure you aren't settling for minimum coverage that does not protect you and your assets in worst-case scenarios.

4. Missing Out on Potential Discounts.

Have you investigated all of the potential discounts you can receive? You may be eligible for discounts that correspond with your lifestyle, such as low-mileage driving. Often you can also receive discounts for having multiple policies through the same insurance carrier, whether it's for an additional automobile or even your homeowner's insurance. Make sure you ask your insurance company or agent about any available discounts that you may qualify for.

5. Neglecting to Consider a Major Life Change.

Be sure to keep your policy current. Something as basic as forgetting to add your new teen driver can cost you dearly in the case of an accident. If any of the following apply to you in the past year, you may need to alter the type and amount of coverage you carry to make sure you're properly covered:

  • You purchased a new home, new car or other property
  • You've had a change in marital status
  • You started a business
  • Your child started driving
  • You moved residences
  • You retired

For more information on auto insurance, please visit gmacinsurance.com.

The GMAC Insurance Group is one of the largest automobile insurers in the United States and is a wholly owned subsidiary of the General Motors Acceptance Corporation (GMAC). GMAC Insurance Personal Lines offers automobile, RV, motorcycle and specialty vehicle insurance, as well as homeowners insurance, to consumers through a number of distribution channels, including independent agents, affinity groups and the Internet (www.gmacinsurance.com). With a nationwide network of claims professionals, local independent agents and a 24-hour, toll-free claims hotline available 365 days a year, GMAC Insurance provides superior claims service for its customers.

Contact:
for The GMAC Insurance Group
Anne Houseman, 617-248-0680, x12
ahouseman@cerconebrown.com

Source: The GMAC Insurance Group

Recommended



Recent posts